Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Saturday, December 14, 2013
Friday, December 6, 2013
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Monday, November 25, 2013
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Friday, November 15, 2013
Monday, November 11, 2013
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Friday, November 8, 2013
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Saturday, November 2, 2013
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Friday, October 25, 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
Saturday, October 19, 2013
Friday, October 18, 2013
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Saturday, September 14, 2013
Thursday, September 5, 2013
Monday, September 2, 2013
Saturday, August 31, 2013
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Monday, August 19, 2013
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
Saturday, July 6, 2013
Saturday, June 29, 2013
FBI Sued For Access to Facial-Recognition Records June 27, 2013
LINK to: Complaint | Electronic Frontier Foundation
As the FBI is rushing to build a "bigger, faster and better" biometrics database, it's also dragging its feet in releasing information related to the program's impact on the American public. In response, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today filed a lawsuit to compel the FBI to produce records to satisfy three outstanding Freedom of Information Act requests that EFF submitted one year ago to shine light on the program and its face-recognition components.
Since early 2011, EFF has been closely following the FBI's work to build out its Next Generation Identification (NGI) biometrics database, which would replace and expand upon the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). The new program will include multiple biometric identifiers, such as iris scans, palm prints, face-recognition-ready photos, and voice data, and that information will be shared with other agencies at the local, state, federal and international levels. The face recognition component is set to launch in 2014.
"NGI will result in a massive expansion of government data collection for both criminal and noncriminal purposes," says EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Lynch, who testified before the U.S. Senate on the privacy implications of facial recognition technology in July of last year. "Biometrics programs present critical threats to civil liberties and privacy. Face-recognition technology is among the most alarming new developments, because Americans cannot easily take precautions against the covert, remote, and mass capture of their images."
In the complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, EFF is asking a judge to enforce EFF's FOIA requests, which were sent to the FBI in June and July of last year. The information sought includes agreements and discussions between the FBI and various state agencies regarding the face-recognition program; records addressing the reliability of face-recognition technology; and documentation of the FBI's plan to merge civilian and criminal records in a single repository. EFF is also seeking disclosure of the total number of face-recognition capable records currently in the FBI's database, as well as the proposed number at deployment.
NGI will have an unprecedented impact on Americans' privacy interests, and yet the FBI has not updated its Privacy Impact Assessment since 2008, well before it built the system and signed agreements with several states for an early roll-out of the program.
"Before the federal government decides to expand its surveillance powers, there needs to be a public debate," Lynch says. "But there can be no public debate until the details of the program are presented to the public."
As the FBI is rushing to build a "bigger, faster and better" biometrics database, it's also dragging its feet in releasing information related to the program's impact on the American public. In response, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) today filed a lawsuit to compel the FBI to produce records to satisfy three outstanding Freedom of Information Act requests that EFF submitted one year ago to shine light on the program and its face-recognition components.
Since early 2011, EFF has been closely following the FBI's work to build out its Next Generation Identification (NGI) biometrics database, which would replace and expand upon the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). The new program will include multiple biometric identifiers, such as iris scans, palm prints, face-recognition-ready photos, and voice data, and that information will be shared with other agencies at the local, state, federal and international levels. The face recognition component is set to launch in 2014.
"NGI will result in a massive expansion of government data collection for both criminal and noncriminal purposes," says EFF Staff Attorney Jennifer Lynch, who testified before the U.S. Senate on the privacy implications of facial recognition technology in July of last year. "Biometrics programs present critical threats to civil liberties and privacy. Face-recognition technology is among the most alarming new developments, because Americans cannot easily take precautions against the covert, remote, and mass capture of their images."
In the complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, EFF is asking a judge to enforce EFF's FOIA requests, which were sent to the FBI in June and July of last year. The information sought includes agreements and discussions between the FBI and various state agencies regarding the face-recognition program; records addressing the reliability of face-recognition technology; and documentation of the FBI's plan to merge civilian and criminal records in a single repository. EFF is also seeking disclosure of the total number of face-recognition capable records currently in the FBI's database, as well as the proposed number at deployment.
NGI will have an unprecedented impact on Americans' privacy interests, and yet the FBI has not updated its Privacy Impact Assessment since 2008, well before it built the system and signed agreements with several states for an early roll-out of the program.
"Before the federal government decides to expand its surveillance powers, there needs to be a public debate," Lynch says. "But there can be no public debate until the details of the program are presented to the public."
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Friday, June 14, 2013
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Sunday, June 2, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Friday, May 24, 2013
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Friday, May 17, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Friday, April 26, 2013
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Saturday, March 30, 2013
Friday, March 29, 2013
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Friday, March 1, 2013
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Friday, February 8, 2013
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Monday, January 21, 2013
Saturday, January 19, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Friday, January 4, 2013
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)